Welcome Guest

Wow, you really are that pathetic are you? 6103 baby

Posted on: May 22, 2019 at 10:37:33 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
183052
Member For:
23.57 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"A century ago, the Teapot Dome corruption scandal engulfed Harding’s administration, spurring Congress to pass legislation that finally reclaimed its right to review private tax returns. It was a solid law, and remains so today: The legislative branch has the power to tax and spend, and the review of personal tax returns falls well within its rights and obligations."

Specifically, Section 6103(f)(1) of the IRC provides
that, upon written request of the Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, Joint Committee on
Taxation (JCT), or Senate Finance Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “tax committees”), the
Treasury Secretary “shall furnish” the requested tax returns or return information to the relevant
committee. Under 6103(f)(2), the Treasury Secretary also “shall furnish” requested tax return information
to the JCT’s chief of staff, who may share the return information to any of the tax committees. A
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I'm really kind of hoping dems use inherent contempt - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/22 08:49:34
     That's nothing. The real evil is threatening their pay. - MizzouTigerz MU - 5/22 09:50:56
          Heard mention of potential personal fines of $25,000 a day - raskolnikov MU - 5/22 10:17:31
               Show me the law (nm) - Sal KC - 5/22 10:27:33
                    Wow, you really are that pathetic are you? 6103 baby - raskolnikov MU - 5/22 10:37:33
                         RE: Wow, you really are that pathetic are you? 6103 baby - None**** MU - 5/22 10:57:36
                              Even within that opinion piece it acknowledges - Sal KC - 5/22 10:59:37
                         1). They still have to have a "legislative purpose" to - Sal KC - 5/22 10:48:44
                              There is no requirement for a legislative purpose - raskolnikov MU - 5/22 10:51:18
                                   goddamn - pickle MU - 5/22 11:01:33
                                   lol what an idiot(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/22 10:54:14
                                        It's obvious now that he was repeating talking points - Sal KC - 5/22 10:55:17
                                             RE: It's obvious now that he was repeating talking points - scan MU - 5/22 11:04:10
                                             of course he is (nm) - pickle MU - 5/22 11:02:57
                                   I had a feeling you were referencing that memo - Sal KC - 5/22 10:52:32
                         lmfao - pickle MU - 5/22 10:42:42
                              Congressional Research Service, dipsht(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/22 10:46:44
                                   lmao no you didn’t - pickle MU - 5/22 10:47:47
                                        RE: lmao no you didn’t - two sites actually - raskolnikov MU - 5/22 10:48:27
                                             Did you not read the legal limitations section? (nm) - Sal KC - 5/22 10:49:57
                                             so dishonest. Where did you get it? (nm) - pickle MU - 5/22 10:49:38
                         lol where does that say Congress can extrajudicially - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/22 10:40:11
                              Didn't say it didw - raskolnikov MU - 5/22 10:47:39
                                   lol man you are a dumbf*ck(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/22 10:50:11
               lol - pickle MU - 5/22 10:27:15
               lol yeah that's not gonna happen(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/22 10:22:20
               The law is garbage(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 5/22 10:20:56
                    Oh, that's a good approach - raskolnikov MU - 5/22 10:28:51
                         you mean like NO REASONABLE prosecutor? hmm - blake1771 KC - 5/22 12:08:15
                         RE: Oh, that's a good approach - scan MU - 5/22 10:37:06
                              I called for that last night - raskolnikov MU - 5/22 10:38:35
                                   RE: I called for that last night - scan MU - 5/22 10:40:02
                         you don’t care about the rule of law - pickle MU - 5/22 10:33:39
                         Like people who sat at lunch counters - El-ahrairah BAMA - 5/22 10:32:32
                              They don't call him Fire Hose Rask for nothing(nm) - dangertim MU - 5/22 10:36:22
                         You're such a sheep.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 5/22 10:31:15
     You know who the cia & fbi are rooting for.(nm) - Toger STL - 5/22 09:01:40
          It isn't for Congress - Sal KC - 5/22 09:04:33
               RE: It isn't for Congress. Or for the people. Particularly - None**** MU - 5/22 09:06:26




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard