Welcome Guest

It was a poorly written report to include GJ testimony.

Posted on: April 18, 2019 at 17:17:18 CT
Logan BAMA
Posts:
14366
Member For:
24.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Should have never been included.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Pretty great seeing this blow up in Barr's face(nm) - Danny Whizzbang USA - 4/18 17:09:16
     I agree! Bring more explosions on! I want more! - DoltfromSTL MU - 4/18 17:51:34
     This seems to fit your post the best. - RHAYWORTH MU - 4/18 17:49:52
          You're really hitched your wagon to the wrong side on this - MUTGR MU - 4/18 17:35:04
               never doubt him - FootballRefugee MU - 4/18 18:10:52
               lol well it is JG - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:43:51
               The boundless energy of delusion - JG A - 4/18 17:38:39
          lol fire can't melt obstruction!! - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:23:00
     Think it's time you sat this one out champ - Calca STL - 4/18 17:17:42
     Trump just locked up 2020 in a landslide and you think - North co-co champs MU - 4/18 17:16:49
     Nothing Barr said was incorrect (nm) - Sal KC - 4/18 17:16:35
     Huh? - Logan BAMA - 4/18 17:12:54
     $hitlibs shreiking does not=anything blowing up in Barr's - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:12:24
     And now he's about to BREAK THE LAW, says Sal - MrBlueSky MU - 4/18 17:10:46
          ok Blue if you want a reminder of how big of a dumba$$ you - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:19:09
          Sal lives in fantasy land, at best Barr has been - playhard KC - 4/18 17:19:05
               What has he lied about? - Sal KC - 4/18 17:19:56
          It was a poorly written report to include GJ testimony. - Logan BAMA - 4/18 17:17:18
               I disagree, it was purposely included to provide Congress an - Mo Texan MU - 4/18 17:49:09
                    I disagree that it should be in the report... - Logan BAMA - 4/18 20:12:57
                         Evidence regardless of it’s source is always included in - Mo Texan MU - 4/18 20:53:02
                              No it isnt. Point to the statute supporting your position - tman MU - 4/18 21:01:40
                                   We’re talking about investigative reports are we not? (nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/19 13:05:15
                    I thought in that ruling - Sal KC - 4/18 18:14:47
                         If you mean Mckeefer(sp?) it left this avenue open(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/18 19:05:17
          Lol did you not even read what you posted? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/18 17:16:09
               You've been saying for weeks - MrBlueSky MU - 4/18 17:20:13
                    No I haven't been saying that - Sal KC - 4/18 17:23:42
                    Link? only thing I've seen him say is if the GJ stuff - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:21:14
                         It literally says "reduced redactions" in Blue's post - Sal KC - 4/18 17:34:39
                              He and murf are straight morons lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:41:40
          LOCK HIM UP! - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/18 17:14:39
               "reduced redactions" - Sal KC - 4/18 17:35:10
                    LAUGH...Sal you really need to - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/18 18:29:39
          uh if he's leaving the GJ redactions how would he be - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:13:48
               another swing and miss for him (nm) - Sal KC - 4/18 17:18:03




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard