Welcome Guest

you're simply just wrong, Packer...

Posted on: June 16, 2012 at 13:24:49 CT
ashtray MU
Posts:
31631
Member For:
10.57 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the NIST wasn't off by a nonosecond. They were off by much more than that and obviously inserted data to make their model conform to their predetermined conclusion.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

more idiots - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 6/16 12:29:15
     LOL Wyco tried that one yesterday - JG MU - 6/16 12:40:27
          Of course I crushed you like a bug - Alferd Packer MU - 6/16 12:55:42
               I have no doubts that - JG MU - 6/16 12:56:41
                    That might be how you think you win. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/16 13:00:36
                         I did refute- all of it - JG MU - 6/16 13:03:12
          what 3 falsehoods? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 6/16 12:42:03
               RE: what 3 falsehoods? - JG MU - 6/16 13:00:17
                    Squish! Again - Alferd Packer MU - 6/16 13:01:54
                         Yes you certainly have been - JG MU - 6/16 14:51:41
               here ya go... - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:43:31
                    welp that proves it - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 6/16 12:50:14
                         Sheldon Cooper would sneer at him.(nm) - Alferd Packer MU - 6/16 12:57:42
                         can we agree that 2+2=4? - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:51:39
                              and you think given all the variables involved that it's as - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 6/16 12:53:22
                                   so you don't agree that 2+2=4? - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:53:58
                                        ok I'll bite, yes I agree that 2+2=4 - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 6/16 12:55:06
                                             then can we also agree that Velocity = Gravity x Time? - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:55:30
     another deflection that doesn't answer the question - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:30:16
          well then it's obviously a stupid and irrelevant question - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 6/16 12:32:41
               even if they were spot on with HOW they collapsed... - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:34:17
                    So NOW it's the TOWERS again. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/16 13:05:22
                    actually it does - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 6/16 12:36:00
                         Damn - JG MU - 6/16 12:41:18
                              Your "facts" are fiction to the rest of the world. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/16 13:06:29
                                   To those like you -sure - JG MU - 6/16 13:09:37
                                        So, what's the "question?" - Alferd Packer MU - 6/16 13:17:35
                                             buh bye - JG MU - 6/16 13:20:22
                         was it constructed with toothpicks? - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:40:57
          Name one time in history that a plane hit a building, with - North co-co champs MU - 6/16 12:32:32
               so the laws of physics are not proven? - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:33:39
                    Its you going against the law of physics and physical - North co-co champs MU - 6/16 12:38:00
                         LOL! - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:42:32
                              According to every piece of evidence, yes, the buildings - North co-co champs MU - 6/16 12:44:02
                                   Wow simply wow - JG MU - 6/16 13:22:29
                                   They're obsessing over minutiae. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/16 13:15:23
                                        you're simply just wrong, Packer... - ashtray USA - 6/16 13:24:49
                                   which goes against the laws of physics - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:46:53
                         ummm it is you who continually avoid - JG MU - 6/16 12:41:56




©2013 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard