Welcome Guest

Its not being suggested planes didn't hit 2 of the 3

Posted on: June 16, 2012 at 12:24:37 CT

JG MU

Posts:

109973

Member For:

9.52 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

buildings.

Its not being suggested there were not fires.

Its not being suggested the buildings weren't weakened.

Its not even being suggested the buildings MIGHT have collapsed eventually.

What is being stated as a fact is that you are avoiding the question.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

duck, dodge and squeal away kooks - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 6/16 12:06:03

doesn't address the question - JG MU - 6/16 12:19:21

please point to the text in the article that - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:07:43

How fast should it have fallen? Name one other time in - North co-co champs MU - 6/16 12:10:23

Its not being suggested planes didn't hit 2 of the 3 - JG MU - 6/16 12:24:37

it would vary based on the amount of resistance offered - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:21:29

So you can't answer the question either (nm) - North co-co champs MU - 6/16 12:27:30

I can say with certainty.. - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:29:38

Name one time other than Sept 11, that we have proof of your - North co-co champs MU - 6/16 12:30:45

the force of gravity has been proven time and time again - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:32:33

Nice deflection, but please answer the question, so that we - North co-co champs MU - 6/16 12:35:58

so resistance is just hocus pocus and not a real thing? - ashtray USA - 6/16 12:49:48