Welcome Guest

Thats a great point, even Wyco acknowledges that

Posted on: May 24, 2012 at 09:51:54 CT
JG MU
Posts:
109775
Member For:
9.51 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Now I know the affect that facts have on you and your buddies- but Hell lets use them anyway.

Remember O'Reilly's famous line that if we went into Iraq and didn't find any WMDs that he would never trust the Bush administration again?
LOL yeah and then he spent the next 7 yrs defending and apologizing for the Bush administration.

But lets review a few facts about Pakistan, 9-11 and Bushco.

It was widely reported that bin Laden suffered from poor health- notabley kidney problems. It was reported that the CIA paid a visit to him in a Dubai Hospital. Also reported that he received dialysis from the ISI.

The week before 9-11 General Ahmad, head of the Pakistani ISI, met with numerous military espionage and political leaders of the United States- none of whom have ever been made public whom much less what these discussions were about. The only exception being the morning of 9-11 he met with Porter Goss and Robert Graham-again nothing ever revealed what the meeting was about.

Daniel Pearl-possibly the only reporter to do any real investigation into 9-11 revealed to the WSJ that General Ahmad of the Pakistani ISI had 100k wire transferred to Mohammad Atta. The WSJ reported the FBI confirmed this. This is probably the most relevent and ignored fact of 9-11.

Daniel Pearl continued his investigations- it is widely understood he was investigating links betweeen al-Queda and the ISI and hence the CIA.

He was murdered.

It is widely believed the actual murder was done by Khalid Shiekh Mohammad- the facilitator (often laughably called the mastermind) of 9-11.

It is also widely believed he was acting in conjunction with, at the behest of or the orders of the ISI.

General Ahmad was quietely retired. No arrest, no questioning, no torture. Just a quiet pension and relaxation.

When bin Laden was allowed to escape Tora Bora he went to Pakistan, where he lived the remainder of his days- however long that was is anyones guess.

Bush gave billions and billions of dollars to Pakistan for reasons really unknown.

Cooler, more logical, more informed opinions stressed that if the War on Terrorism was anything but a sham that Pakistan was one of the main suspects.

And Bill O'Reilly never uttered a peep about these facts. Similar to GAT, Wyco, Socal - deafening silence and deflection.

Pakistan has been rewarded with billions upon billions of dollars- for reasons that never made any real logic- givern the real facts.

I guess you could say Bill O'Reilly has finally learned whats what- but like GAT, Wyco, Socal-hypocrisy (a word that none of them understands) is in fact the real reason they suddenly think the aid to Pakistan spigot should be shut off.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Good question by O'Reilly, - GA Tiger MU - 5/23 19:04:58
     You remember when Romney was criticizing Obama about - Doc_Nice MU - 5/23 22:06:31
          no, never heard of that. Why would I care about a... - SoCalTigr UM - 5/23 23:39:57
     I don't recall your admonishing Bush - JG MU - 5/23 19:09:56
          Recall that you never asked what I thought about it? - GA Tiger MU - 5/23 19:18:26
               Damn GAT - Panthera MU - 5/24 13:09:24
               We never asked about this either(nm) - Doc_Nice MU - 5/23 22:02:38
               I didn't ask your opinion about O'Reillys hypocrisy - JG MU - 5/23 19:19:37
                    What, exactly, is O'Reilly's "hypocrisy?" - Alferd Packer MU - 5/23 19:59:42
                         what isn't O'Reilly's "hypocrisy?" - SoCalTigr UM - 5/23 20:12:19
                              Thats a great point, even Wyco acknowledges that - JG MU - 5/24 09:51:54
                              George reminds me a lot of ku now. - GA Tiger MU - 5/23 21:11:46
                              O'Reilly could not be more consistent - Coors4bob MU - 5/23 20:41:35
                                   Sure -extremely consistent. Hypocritical always - JG MU - 5/24 09:54:02
                                   That's how I see it, too. - Alferd Packer MU - 5/23 20:46:31
                                   O'Reilly is more than fair with everyone - SoCalTigr UM - 5/23 20:43:45
                              That's about the strength of any of his arguments. - Alferd Packer MU - 5/23 20:19:21




©2013 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard