Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Agreed, he should have been ejected.

Posted on: May 23, 2012 at 19:26:02 CT
RememberQuantrill KC
Posts:
36454
Member For:
6.67 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
But not suspended for the next game just because the refs ****ed up the call.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So the two black guys get suspended but goodie two - RememberQuantrill MU - 5/23 18:50:04
     I see what you are saying...the TH thing was a hard foul - FromKCtoCoMO MU - 5/23 19:24:10
     The word is getting overused...not every effing thing is - jp4Mizzou STL - 5/23 19:18:41
          But this is clearly racism. (nm) - RememberQuantrill MU - 5/23 19:19:31
               In a league of which the majority of players are of one - jp4Mizzou STL - 5/23 19:23:10
                    lol (nm) - RememberQuantrill MU - 5/23 19:25:34
                         PS... - jp4Mizzou STL - 5/23 19:27:43
     even if Haslem got ejected, i think a 1gm suspension - TigerwTLP STL - 5/23 18:56:29
          That's weak. It was a very hard foul, but it was not - RememberQuantrill MU - 5/23 18:58:07
               Wasn't malicious? - quinsnyderjr MU - 5/23 20:37:31
                    So you've spoken with Haslem and know his intent? (nm) - RememberQuantrill MU - 5/24 08:15:04
               I disagree, because I believe it's based on intent - FromKCtoCoMO MU - 5/23 19:24:56
                    Agreed, he should have been ejected. - RememberQuantrill MU - 5/23 19:26:02
               all fouls aren't equal - TigerwTLP STL - 5/23 19:04:09
                    I didn't say they were equal. (nm) - RememberQuantrill MU - 5/23 19:12:52
               Two arms is a flagrant any way you cut it - Bobk MU - 5/23 19:02:44
                    It was a flagrant. I think it should have been a flagrant 2. - RememberQuantrill MU - 5/23 19:11:57




©2013 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard