 |
|
Of course they add revenue, they have to, since 12 is bigger
Posted on: May 12, 2012 at 17:24:10 CT
tigerboardnoob MU
Posts:
10178
Member For:
2.15 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
than 10. But it wont be a significant jump up from the 20 million that the Big 12 cronies are talking about now.
You have to subtract 4 million off of each currents schools share. Now of course that is not accurate, since BEVO and OU get a larger cut, and schools like TCU and others get a much smaller cut to begin with.
Now the TV networks can make sure all schools including those 2 get 20 million, because they can rework the deal.
But if you think adding FSU and Clemson is going to bring those 2 schools and the other ten schools an extra 2-5 million on their own, or because of where they are located. You are sadly mistaken.
If FSU and Clemson could generate 20-30 million alone per year in TV viewership, then the ACC would not have a ****ty deal as it is.
You have to subtract 4 million off of each currents schools share. Now of course that is not accurate, since BEVO and OU get a larger cut, and schools like TCU and others get a much smaller cut to begin with.
Now the TV networks can make sure all schools including those 2 get 20 million, because they can rework the deal.
But if you think adding FSU and Clemson is going to bring those 2 schools and the other ten schools an extra 2-5 million on their own, or because of where they are located. You are sadly mistaken.
If FSU and Clemson could generate 20-30 million alone per year in TV viewership, then the ACC would not have a ****ty deal as it is.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Of course they add revenue, they have to, since 12 is bigger - tigerboardnoob MU - 5/12 17:24:10