Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Know its not our conf anymore, but does anyone know

Posted on: April 12, 2012 at 11:42:50 CT
FIJItiger MU
Posts:
55323
Member For:
10.44 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
20
if the Big 12 updated its rules or something?

http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl/1995_1314415/big-12-to-limit-partial-qualifiers-presidents-perm.html

"Big 12 Conference presidents voted Wednesday to limit each school annually to two partial academic qualifiers of each gender and to ban signing non-qualifiers, effective immediately.

Big 12 schools can award two men's scholarships and two women's scholarships to student-athletes who do not qualify under both the tougher NCAA grade-point-average and standardized-test requirements that take effect next fall. No more than one scholarship may be in the same sport."

The fact that neither Ben McLemore or Jamari Traylor seemed to have any issue paying out of state tuition this year as students not eligible for athletic scholarships aside.....how can both of them be eligible next year if neither qualified and the Big 12 rules state that a school can have a max of 2 of the same gender and they can't be in the same sport?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Know its not our conf anymore, but does anyone know - FIJItiger MU - 4/12 11:42:50
     Here is when NU lost Sallie to Memphis because of 6.2 - SuperTone MU - 4/12 14:47:37
     Here is Big12 rule 6.2. It doesn't allow them - SuperTone MU - 4/12 14:42:52
          This rule makes no mention of "partial qualifiers" - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 16:07:11
               Um, the NCAA did away with partial qualifiers... - SuperTone MU - 4/12 16:41:15
                    Here is another link that shows that you don't know - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 17:09:45
                         NCAA did away with them in 2005...read the NCAA eligibility - SuperTone MU - 4/12 17:21:40
                              This link is dated 2011 so evidently there has been - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 17:28:04
                                   Here is an NCAA link for you.... - SuperTone MU - 4/12 18:00:07
                                   No. I just checked NCAA rules for eligibility.... - SuperTone MU - 4/12 17:58:44
                                        Not saying you're wrong because I honestly have no clue.... - Nevada_Tiger MU - 4/12 18:18:59
                                             either way the big 12 doesn't allow partial or non-qualifier - SuperTone MU - 4/12 19:20:59
                                                  That wasn't the conversation.... - Nevada_Tiger MU - 4/12 20:32:21
                                        Good job. I suspect we've heard the last of him for tonight. - Sparky Stalcup MU - 4/12 18:14:03
                                             The fact is that the NCAA is allowing partial - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 19:12:31
                                                  the NCAA allows non qualifiers to play, the big12 - SuperTone MU - 4/12 19:41:48
                                                  another link - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 19:30:13
                                                       another non-ncaa link from another ignorant writer... - SuperTone MU - 4/12 19:42:38
                                                            I guess you classify the U Mass coach as being ignorant - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 20:20:06
          So what is going on? Are they just ignoring it or does - FIJItiger MU - 4/12 15:05:22
               Dunno. I don't get it either. There has to be more - SuperTone MU - 4/12 15:06:12
     The new bylaws don't even allow 2 anymore.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 4/12 14:30:38
          by new I mean several years old.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 4/12 14:33:17
     Here is a link which might help clarify how they - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 12:41:05
          This article is not credible. There are no "partial - SuperTone MU - 4/12 15:41:32
          No, I'm saying set that part aside - FIJItiger MU - 4/12 12:43:54
               You are posting rules more than 16 years old so they well - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 12:49:13
                    see below. they dont know their own rules, they do what they - Mizzmi27 MU - 4/12 13:57:16
                    It is without my knowledge, hence the post - FIJItiger MU - 4/12 12:58:10
                         It should be pretty obvious that it has been changed as for - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 13:14:43
                              Sounds like all you have is an "opinion"....(nm) - tigersfan MU - 4/12 13:55:27
                                   It is obvious that my statementt is more than my - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 15:38:51
                                        You're speculating. Give a link to the rule change. - BadAsh SEC - 4/12 17:00:27
                                             From this link you can see that it is not something for KU. - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 17:31:20
                                                  Here is another one that does not involve KU. - SwmoBig12fan - 4/12 17:44:35
                              How is it obvious? You mean by the lack of anyone who can - FIJItiger MU - 4/12 13:19:21
                    RE: You are posting rules more than 16 years old so they well - Bubbster KU - 4/12 12:52:06
     This issue was raised 6-7 months ago as well. The question - mdoc MU - 4/12 11:58:52
          Not a new rule, the article I'm citing was written - FIJItiger MU - 4/12 12:25:43
     B12 doesn't know it's own bylaws or follow them so it doesn' - Mizzmi27 MU - 4/12 11:50:46
          On thing not in question, - FIJItiger MU - 4/12 11:57:05
               RE: On thing not in question, - KCRvrRnnr KU - 4/12 18:37:25




©2013 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard