Posted on: April 4, 2012 at 14:27:46 CT
I'd have to have '09 and '94 in my Top 5. Then '05 would be competing with one of '89/'90, one of '80/'82 and one of '73/'76 to make the list.
'05 not as talented as either of the '89/'90 squads but an EE is still significant.
Can't put '05 ahead of the '80/'82 squad.
Maybe a push with the '73/'76 squad but only because I'm trying not to let sentimentality play a part. Nah, I can't put them ahead of this group.
So that leaves the matchup against the '89/'90 contender. Man, that first round loss to Northern Iowa in '90 (right?) is a definite negative. That team was having chemistry issues as well.