Welcome Guest

then why respond dip****?

Posted on: March 25, 2012 at 19:49:12 CT

restore the roar MU

Posts:

7489

Member For:

14.32 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Dont like it dont respond. God your an ass clown.

And that doesnt change the fact that the track SUCKS.

Edited by restore the roar at 19:49:35 on 03/25/12

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Stadium expansion: if the goal is to maximize revenue - 90183 MU - 3/25 12:37:56

RE: Stadium expansion: if the goal is to maximize revenue - mutigers28 MU - 3/25 15:40:02

I would remodel Touchdown Terrace - implode STL - 3/25 13:45:19

and get rid of the track - restore the roar MU - 3/25 14:07:48

With or without the track, the stands aren't getting closer - SuperTone MU

- 3/25 19:11:53

then why respond dip****? - restore the roar MU - 3/25 19:49:12

I wouldn't touch the track at all - implode STL - 3/25 15:23:33

I proposed that thinking you could lower the field - restore the roar MU - 3/25 15:37:10

Even if it were possible the pitch of the current - SuperTone MU

- 3/25 19:12:34

pitch can be reconfigured - restore the roar MU - 3/25 19:50:31

Getting rid of the track won't make the stands closer(nm) - SB in KC MU - 3/25 14:20:31

Won't happen. Can't lower the field. If seats - BadAsh SEC - 3/25 14:16:10

hate the track look nm - restore the roar MU - 3/25 14:39:21

It's not that noticeable when you're at the game.... - KINGTIGER KC - 3/25 14:29:10

Many things can be done. What I'd like to see: - BadAsh SEC - 3/25 16:12:24

One has to add vision into the mix - samclemens MU

- 3/25 13:30:08

I agree and I also think... - KINGTIGER KC - 3/25 13:17:42

standard short sighted thinking... - CalicoTiger MU

- 3/25 12:52:33

agreed, and... - restore the roar MU - 3/25 13:26:42

we only needed 19k in 1929. We should stick with that.(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 3/25 13:07:40